AI Infra Interviews logo

Mistral Large 4 / MoE

Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B

A European 1T open-weight MoE with two artifact paths

Open-weight releaseSources checked 2026-11-06

Mistral Large 4 belongs on a shortlist for large-cluster coding and multimodal work, and it is the largest open-weight release from Mistral so far. The deployment choice starts with the artifact: this FP8 checkpoint needs about 128 GiB of weights per GPU across eight GPUs, while the separate NVFP4 checkpoint targets Blackwell at about 76 GiB per GPU.

1,000Breported total parameters
52Bactive parameters per token
1,048,576configured token positions

Publisher-reported, rounded: about 1T total and 52B active including embeddings and output layer (49B without). Mistral's documentation gives 1.05T; the vision encoder is separate.

Evaluate it for

Multi-GPU Blackwell, H200 or MI350-class deployments that want a 1T-class model under a modified-MIT license.

Choose another path when

Fewer than eight GPUs with clearly more than 141 GB each for the FP8 artifact, or ROCm with the NVFP4 artifact, which the recipe does not support.

Release context

Why this release matters

It combines 128 routed experts with four active and one shared expert, latent-attention projections and a sparse-attention indexer, at a 1M context setting. Mistral moved from an October 6 public preview to open weights at the end of the month.

Public preview announced 6 October with weights promised by month end; the public repository's first release commit is dated 29 October.

Release evidence · Announced 2026-10-06 · Weights 2026-10-29 · Follow the Mistral Large 4 timeline →

Deployment starting points

Which hardware, how many, at what precision?

Start with an exact artifact and an engine that supports it. A configuration below is evidence of a documented path; its device count does not promise a particular throughput or concurrency.

Runtime recipe

8 × B300 HGX

288 GB per GPU

FP8 (this checkpoint)

vllm/vllm-openai:mistral-large-4 image

Validated in the recipe's base hardware list. About 128 GiB of FP8 weights per GPU across eight GPUs. No vLLM release supported the model when checked; use the model-specific image.

Checkpoint and source

mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B

Checked 2026-11-06. Read the documented setup →

Hardware specifications and interconnect →

Runtime recipe

8 × MI350X

288 GB per GPU

FP8 with MXFP4 experts at load

vllm/vllm-openai-rocm:mistral-large-4 image

TP8, or two TP4 replicas per node. MI300-series GPUs and the NVFP4 checkpoint are not supported on ROCm in the recipe.

Checkpoint and source

mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B

Checked 2026-11-06. Read the documented setup →

Hardware specifications and interconnect →

Capacity screen: would the weights fit?

This estimates inference memory for a hypothetical uniform precision. It is useful for rejecting an allocation that is too small. It does not establish a working deployment or estimate training memory.

A uniform-precision GPU count would hide this model’s component layout. Publisher-reported, rounded: about 1T total and 52B active including embeddings and output layer (49B without). Mistral's documentation gives 1.05T; the vision encoder is separate. Use the documented artifact and placement path above; no GPU count is inferred here.

Architecture in practice

What the serving engine has to do

Store the history. Read the selected parts.

Retained KV historyall state required by the modelIndex / selectionfind relevant blocksSelected KV blocksa subset of the retained historyAttention outputcomputed from selected reads

Fewer bytes read can reduce bandwidth pressure.

That does not prove an equal reduction in stored bytes.

Schematic of block-sparse attention. The indexer selects relevant blocks; attention reads those blocks from retained state. Index sharing can reuse selection work across layers. Read traffic, index work and allocated KV capacity are separate quantities.

Mechanism schematic based on the pinned model card and configuration. It explains a design principle; it is not a full implementation graph.

Inspect the full checkpoint specifications
Inspected fields for this exact revision. KV heads alone do not describe latent, hybrid or shared-cache layouts.
Exact checkpointmistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B
Text model typemistral_large4_text
Layers72
Hidden width6,144
Attention / KV heads64 / 64
Head dimension64
Routed / selected experts128 / 4
Configured positions1,048,576
Documented extensionNot recorded for this checkpoint
Inputs → outputtext, image → text
License metadatamistral-ecosystem-open-weight · custom terms

Open weights do not imply unrestricted use. Read the applicable license terms linked from the pinned card.

A useful comparison

What else belongs on the shortlist?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is a larger hybrid-attention alternative; GLM-5.3 is the coding-agent model Mistral's announcement benchmarks against.

2 Nov 2026

Kimi-K3.1-Pro

K3's stack with sparse attention in place of full attention

2,800B reported total · text + image

14 Aug 2026

GLM-5.3

A post-training release with a changed adoption decision

743B reported total · text

These are editorial comparison candidates. We have not run a matched quality or serving benchmark, so this is not a ranking.

Prepare to explain it

The interview lesson

Use the recipe's per-GPU weight figures to explain why the same model needs 16 H200s in FP8 but runs on four GB300 GPUs in NVFP4, and what is left for the KV cache in each case.

Attention layouts · Quantization · Courses and worked examples

For a deployment evaluation, record exact weights, precision, engine, device count, interconnect, prompt/output lengths and concurrency. Report task success, errors, TTFT, TPOT and useful throughput together.

Sources and citation

Our assessment is editorial judgment based on the linked architecture and deployment evidence. Model facts are publisher-reported or attributed to runtime maintainers; no independent GPU benchmark was run.

AI Infra Interviews, “Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B: release, architecture and deployment”, checked 2026-11-06. Preserve this date and the exact checkpoint when citing.

Model and research notes as JSON · Mistral AI profile