AMD Instinct MI325X
256 GB of HBM on an AMD CDNA 3 accelerator. The memory is useful only after the model’s kernels and serving engine work on the ROCm target.
HBM3e
Published peak, not measured application throughput
The checked GLM-5.3-Flash vLLM ROCm image is gated to gfx950; the recipe says MI300X/MI325X support is pending. These cards can fit many models, but that does not prove this particular recipe works.
When this is a sensible choice
Start here if…
Compare this part when an existing ROCm workload is constrained by per-device memory or weight traffic. Keep the engine build and quantization format fixed for a useful hardware comparison.
Choose another configuration if…
Do not assume a CUDA-only fused kernel has an equivalent ROCm implementation. Validate attention, experts, collectives and any speculative-decoding path before treating a memory calculation as a deployment.
Specifications with their boundaries attached
- Architecture
- CDNA 3
- Memory
- 256 GB HBM3e
- Memory bandwidth
- 6 TB/s per accelerator
- Peak compute
- 1,307.4 TFLOPS BF16; 2,614.9 FP8, dense
- Scale-up interconnect
- Infinity Fabric; ROCm table lists 896 GB/s ring aggregate
- Host attachment
- PCIe 5.0 x16; OAM server module
- Power
- 1,000 W
- Partitioning
- ROCm compute/memory partition modes; not NVIDIA MIG
- Catalogue status
- Documented product
Compute figures are theoretical peaks at the stated precision. Dense and structured-sparse rates must not be mixed. Bandwidth labelled bidirectional combines both directions. See the source documents.
Three bandwidths, three different jobs
Infinity Fabric; ROCm table lists 896 GB/s ring aggregate
InfiniBand, RoCE, EFA or provider-specific transport
Where it appears in provider documentation
No provider configuration has been verified for this exact variant in this reference. Consult the linked manufacturer documentation; catalogue absence here is not evidence that the hardware is unavailable.
Model fit and software support
These publisher or serving-engine documents mention this hardware family. They have not been reproduced on our machines.
No model-specific recipe in our reviewed set certifies this exact hardware. The memory calculator can narrow candidates, but it cannot establish software support. Read the model register.
What is the memory floor?
Start with total parameters, then add the memory the workload needs. This arithmetic does not certify a serving configuration. All output sizes below are decimal GB.
Override device capacity with the memory exposed by your allocation, particularly for cloud B300 and partitioned devices. The starting 32 GB budget and 15% reserve are editable teaching assumptions. They are not measurements for the selected model. Mixed-precision tensors, quantization scales, vision encoders and draft models can increase the weight payload.
Raw weights only
320B × 8 bits ÷ 8
Budget per device
256 GB × (1 − 15%)
Arithmetic lower bound
round up ((weights + 32) ÷ budget)
This assumes perfectly balanced sharding. A result of three does not prove that a three-device parallel layout is supported. Check layer/expert divisibility, actual allocatable memory, precision kernels and the fabric before renting.
320B is the model card’s total; 18B active is not its storage size. The vLLM recipe reports about 306 GiB for the native FP8 checkpoint. Hopper requires BF16 KV for this model; the documented ROCm path targets gfx950, not every Instinct GPU. Read the model source ↗
For full training, also budget gradients, optimizer states, activations and communication buffers. The inference weight estimate above is insufficient.
Tokens per second, TTFT and TPOT are not certified for this hardware in our reference. Use the benchmark checklist to compare an exact model, software revision and workload.
Nearby memory capacities, different tradeoffs
These are comparison candidates selected by memory capacity, not performance rankings or drop-in replacements.
NVIDIA GB300 NVL72
A rack-scale system, not a single PCIe card. This comparison uses 279 GB per GPU from GCP’s four-GPU VM configuration; the full rack includes 72 GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs.
NVIDIA B300 HGX
Blackwell Ultra’s larger HBM budget helps large models and long context. A cloud allocation may expose less memory than the 288 GB physical-product figure.
AMD Instinct MI355X
288 GB of HBM on an AMD CDNA 4 accelerator. The memory is useful only after the model’s kernels and serving engine work on the ROCm target.
Sources and review scope
Manufacturer and cloud documentation checked 2026-09-12. We reviewed specifications and the stated product boundaries; we did not run training or serving benchmarks on this device. Cloud memory and availability can differ by configuration.
- AMD MI325X launch specifications ↗ · checked 2026-09-12
- AMD workload optimization and interconnect comparison ↗ · checked 2026-09-12
- AMD CDNA 3 architecture whitepaper ↗ · checked 2026-09-12
- AMD MI325X platform specifications ↗ · checked 2026-09-12
Cite this reference
AI Infra Interviews. AMD Instinct MI325X: specifications and workload fit. Reviewed . https://aiinfrainterviews.com/hardware/mi325x
Include your access date when citing a changing specification. Link to the specification section for hardware figures or the explanation for a sizing or workload decision.
Research method and limits
We compile manufacturer specifications, cloud documentation, model cards and serving recipes. The reference preserves source units and distinguishes individual devices from nodes and racks. Conflicting figures and unknown fields remain labelled.
Our contribution is the comparison, unit reconciliation, worked arithmetic and workload explanation. Published peaks are vendor specifications. Calculator results are estimates under the displayed assumptions. Neither is a measurement from our own accelerator lab.
For a manufacturer’s specification, consult the original source documents. Cite our page when using its analysis, and retain primary-source attribution for underlying figures. This curated reference does not establish market share, live availability or a universal performance ranking.
Found a discrepancy? Send a correction with the page URL, exact variant, disputed figure and supporting primary document.
