Your fleet is replacing one percent of its GPUs every month. Is that normal, and how would you find out?

Published data gives an interruption rate, and replacements are a fraction of interruptions, so the comparison needs care before it means anything. The derivation that turns one into the other, the answer for a healthy fleet, and the four cuts through the data that turn an anomalous number into a cause.

Updated Sep 2026 · Grounded in real AI infrastructure interview loops and written to a senior-engineer editorial bar, with every number worked and every diagram hand-built.

20 answers per topic instead of 10, plus saved progress and bookmarks · no cardor unlock all 283 remaining answers · ₹2,000 / $25

The concepts behind this question

Ranked by how closely each one overlaps this question's topic, so the first card is the thing to read if the answer above moved too fast.

Foundational

🧮 Open Weights & Serving Engines

Serving Benchmarks That Do Not LieMost published serving numbers are not comparable to each other and not predictive of production, because they differ in the input distribution, the concurrency, whether the cache was warm, and which of several very different metrics is being reported. A benchmark that supports a decision has to fix all four, report a distribution rather than a mean, and be run against the traffic shape you actually serve. The single most useful discipline is to compute the bandwidth bound first, so you know what fraction of the possible you achieved.

Foundational

🖧 Hardware & Cluster Build-Out

Burn-In and Acceptance TestingNew hardware fails early or it fails late, and burn-in exists to move the early failures before the cluster is handed over rather than after. A proper acceptance test runs every layer under sustained load for days, compares every node against its siblings rather than against a specification, and produces a signed number the buyer and the vendor both agree on. The comparison is the important part: identical hardware running identical work should produce identical numbers, and the outliers are the finding.

Foundational

🩺 Fleet Reliability & Observability

GPU Failure Modes and XID ErrorsWhen a GPU misbehaves, the NVIDIA driver writes an XID line to the kernel log, and the number on that line is the first and often the only clue to what happened. Fleet engineers learn a dozen of them the way doctors learn a dozen lab values: 13 and 31 are almost always the application, 48 and 95 are memory that needs a reset, 63 and 64 are the row remapper reporting or failing, 74 is the NVLink fabric, 79 is a GPU that has vanished from the PCIe bus. This page gives the taxonomy, the decision for each (retry, reset, drain, RMA), and the derivation of how often a big fleet should expect each.

Core

🩺 Fleet Reliability & ObservabilitySign in

DCGM and GPU TelemetryNVIDIA's Data Center GPU Manager reads a GPU's counters, runs its diagnostics and exports both to the monitoring stack, and nearly every fleet's dashboards and alerts are built on it. The skill is knowing which of its hundreds of fields carry signal: the profiling metrics that say whether the tensor cores are busy (not the utilization number everyone reads first), the error counters that predict a failure, the throttle reasons that explain a slow step, and the diagnostic levels that decide whether a node returns to the pool. This page walks those fields, derives an MFU estimate from them, and gives a fleet's alert thresholds.

Explore the full curriculum →

UP NEXT ON YOUR JOURNEY

Closest to this topicDescribe a time you were confidently wrong about a root cause. What did it cost?Closest to this topicHow do GPUs actually fail at fleet scale, how often, and which failures should the platform expect to handle every day?Closest to this topicTransceivers are failing at three times the rate you budgeted. Find out why.

FEDITOR'S NOTE

Scored on converting the published interruption rate into an expected replacement rate rather than comparing incomparable numbers, on concluding 1% monthly is high, and on the cohort analysis that localizes the cause.

DISCUSSION · 0

No comments yet — be the first to share your approach.