Every tenant bursts independently, so the shared tier sees the sum of uncorrelated peaks rather than the sum of averages. The provisioning arithmetic that follows, the three isolation boundaries, and why per-tenant local storage solves most of it before any policy is written.
Design storage for a multi-tenant GPU cloud. How do you keep one customer's checkpoint burst from slowing another's training run?
Every tenant bursts independently, so the shared tier sees the sum of uncorrelated peaks rather than the sum of averages. The provisioning arithmetic that follows, the three isolation boundaries, and why per-tenant local storage solves most of it before any policy is written.
Updated Sep 2026 · Grounded in real AI infrastructure interview loops and written to a senior-engineer editorial bar, with every number worked and every diagram hand-built.
The concepts behind this question
Ranked by how closely each one overlaps this question's topic, so the first card is the thing to read if the answer above moved too fast.
Scored on provisioning for uncorrelated peaks rather than averages, on the three isolation boundaries (capacity, throughput, namespace), and on preferring node-local capacity over shared-tier arbitration.
No comments yet — be the first to share your approach.
